Model of Crisis Corporate Communications Management Dependingon the Type of Conflict Situation at the Root of the Crisis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2025.86.8Keywords:
corporate communications, crisis communications, model, public relations, PRAbstract
The object of the study is crisis corporate communications, a special direction of PR and organizational practice that manages the stakeholdersʼ attitude and the companyʼs reputation during and after a crisis. Relevance of the topic, on the one hand, is associated with the urgent scientific and practical need for algorithmizing of crisis communications and, on the other hand, with the growing value for modern companies of the skills to respond promptly and effectively to various challenges under the pressure of multiple crises. The study aims to analyze the theoretical basis and practical cases (crises of various origins and scales with the participation of McDonaldʼs in Ukraine in 2007–2011). Based on this analysis, we seek to develop a model of crisis corporate communications management that accounts for the causes of the crisis, establishes a sequence of management decisions, and determines the types of reactions to crisis signals depending on the nature of the conflict and the level of coverage of crisis information. Research methods include a critical review of the main concepts, models, and techniques described in the scientific literature, as well as a case study as a descriptive qualitative research method, which is based on the “problem – solution” approach and helps to format each of the analyzed cases based on causes and consequences. The main conclusions indicate that the proposed model provides the understanding of the logic and universal sequence actions during crisis communications and can be the ground for forming crisis response algorithms. The model is based on three matrices. The first helps to link the origin and likely impact of the crisis with the type of organization’s response. The second establishes the sequence of managerial decision-making when choosing a response to crisis signals. The third determines the types of response to crisis signals depending on the type of conflict underlying the crisis and the level of coverage of the public and media with crisis information
Downloads
References
Bergold, R.T. (2012). How PR Can Save the Day. QSR. Retrieved from https://www.qsrmagazine.com/how-pr-can-save-day.
Borda, J.L., & Mackey-Kallis, S. (2003). A model for crisis management. In Millar, D.P., & Heath, R.L. (Eds.), Responding to Crisis: A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication (1st ed.), 117–137. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781410609496.
Brataas, K. (2018). Crisis communication: Case studies and lessons learned from international disasters (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315368245.
Cohn, R. (2007). The PR Crisis Bible: How to Take Charge of the Media When All Hell Breaks Loose. Robin Cohn.
Coombs, W.T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: the development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163–176. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550049.
Coombs, W.T. (2010). Parameters for Crisis Communication. In Coombs, W.T. & Holladay, S.J. (Eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communication, 7–53. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1002/9781444314885.ch1.
Coombs, T. (2012). Crisis Communication and its allied fields. In Coombs, T. & Holladay, S. (Eds.), The Handbook of Crisis Communications, 54–65. Wiley-Blackwell.
Coombs, W. (2014). Applied crisis communication and crisis management. SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781544308531.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Traditions. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Dhanesh, G.S., & Sriramesh, K. (2018). Culture and crisis communication: Nestle India’s Maggi noodles case. Journal of International Management, 24(3), 204–214. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2017.12.004.
Fearn-Banks, K. (2001). Crisis communication: A review of some best practices. In Heath, R.L. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations, 479–486. SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781452220727.
Fearn-Banks, K. (2016). Crisis Communications: A Casebook Approach (5th ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315684857.
Fink, S. (1986). Crisis management: Planning for the inevitable. AMACOM, New York.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Random House.
Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2020). Crisis Communication. Berlin, Boston, Walter de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110554236.
Heath, R.L., & O’Hair, H.D. (2010). The Significance of Crisis and Risk Communication. In Heath, R.L., & O’Hair, H.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (1st ed.), 5–30. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003070726.
Hermann, C.F. (1963). Some consequences of crisis which limit the viability of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 8(1), 61–82. doi:10.2307/2390887.
Herrero, A. G., & Pratt, C. B. (1996). An integrated symmetrical model for crisis-communications management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8(2), 79–105. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0802_01.
Lund, F.H. (1925). The Psychology of Belief IV: The Law of Primacy in Persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20(2), 183–91.
Malecki, K.M., Keating, J.A., & Safdar, N. (2021). Crisis communication and public perception of COVID-19 risk in the era of social media. Clinical infectious diseases, 72(4), 697–702.
van der Meer, T., Verhoeven, P., Beentjes, H. & Vliegenthart, R. (2017). Communication in times of crisis: The stakeholder relationship under pressure. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 426–440. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.005.
Oltarzhevskyi, D., & Zagorulko, Y. (2025). Understanding Corporate Communications (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003484622.
Pruitt, D.G., & Kim, S.H. (2004). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. McGraw-Hill.
Schnabel, J., Anderson, P., & De Francesco, F. (2024). Multilevel governance and political leadership: Crisis communication in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(9), 2719–2747. doi:10.1080/13501763.2023.2199784.
Sellnow, D.D., Lane, D.R., Sellnow, T.L., & Littlefield, R.S. (2017). The IDEA model as a best practice for effective instructional risk and crisis communication. Communication Studies, 68(5), 552–567. doi:10.1080/10510974.2017.1375535.
Sellnow, T.L., & Seeger, M.W. (2021). Theorizing crisis communication (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Seymour, M., & Moore, S. (2000). Effective crisis management: Worldwide principles and practice. London, Cassell.
Veil, S.R., & Husted, R.A. (2012). Best practices as an assessment for crisis communication. Journal of Communication Management, 16(2), 131–145. doi:10.1108/13632541211217560.
Wodak, R. (2021). Crisis communication and crisis management during COVID-19. Global Discourse, 11(3), 329–353. doi:10.1332/204378921X16100431230102.
Zaremba, A.J. (2010). Crisis Communication: Theory and Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315705361.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Дмитро Олтаржевський, Михайло Шуранов (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors reserve the right to author their work and transfer to the journal the right to first publish this work under the CC BY 4.0 license, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication in this journal.
b. Authors have the right to enter into independent additional agreements on non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published in this journal (for example, to place the work in the electronic repository or publish in a monograph), provided that the link to the first publication in this journal.
c. The journal's policy allows and encourages authors to post manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in repositories or on personal websites) both before the submission of this manuscript and during its editorial processing, as it promotes productive scientific discussion and has a positive impact. on the efficiency and dynamics of citing published work.
