Asymmetric tools of influence and strategic communication in cyberspace during the Russian-Ukrainian full-scale war

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2026.88.16

Keywords:

strategic communications, asymmetric influence, cyberspace, narrative management, cognitive resilience, network-centric warfare, OSINT, Russian-Ukrainian war

Abstract

The article explores the phenomenon of asymmetry within the system of strategic communications in the context of modern cyber warfare. The authors categorize asymmetric tools, identifying cognitive, technological, and intelligence-informational methods of influence. Particular attention is paid to the communicative effects arising from the use of non-linear digital strategies: from civilian OSINT to algorithmic narrative management. It is proven that the full-scale war has triggered a transformation of StratCom models from hierarchical to networked ones, where the state acts as a moderator of a meaning-based ecosystem, and citizens become active subjects of cyber-resistance. It is substantiated that the use of asymmetric tools not only negates the adversary’s resource advantage but also directly strengthens the cognitive resilience of society. The research findings can be applied to improve national security strategies and develop innovative approaches to information management in conflict environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Yurii Havrylets, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

    Yurii HAVRYLETS

References

Alberts, D. S., & Garstka, J. J., & Stein, F. P. (2001). Network Centric Warfare. DoD Cooperative Re-search Program. http://dodccrp.org/files/Alberts_NCW.pdf.

Claverie, B., & du Cluzel, F. (2023). The Cognitive Warfare Concept. NATO Innovation Hub. https://innovationhub-act.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CW-article-Claverie-du-Cluzel-final_0.pdf.

Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244.

Lind, W. S. (2004). Understanding Fourth Generation War. Military Review.

Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. Routledge.

Molander, R. C., Riddile, A. S., & Wilson, P. A. (1996). Strategic information warfare: a new face of war. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR661.pdf

NATO StratCom COE. (2023). Social Media Manipulation Report. Riga.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs.

Rid, T. (2012). Cyber War Will Not Take Place. Oxford University Press.

Singer, P. W., & Brooking, E. T. (2018). LikeWar: The Weaponization of Social Media. Eamon Do-lan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton Universi-ty Press.

Горбулін, В. П. (2017). Світова гібридна війна: український фронт. НІСД.

Дубов, Д. В. (2014). Кіберпростір як новий об’єкт державної політики. НІСД.

Картунов О., Маруховський О. (2012). Інформаційне суспільство: аналіз політичних аспектів зарубіжних концепцій: Монографія. Київ: Університет економіки та права «Крок». 344 с.

Компанцева О., Заруба О., Череватий С., Акульшин О. (2022). Стратегічні комунікації для безпекових і державних інституцій : практичний посібник. Київ: ТОВ «ВІСТКА». http://fes.kiev.ua/n/cms/fileadmin/upload2/Book_28-06-2022_web-3.pdf.

Курбан, О. В. (2016). Інформаційні війни у соціальних мережах. КНУ.

Магда, Є. В. (2015). Гібридна війна: вижити і перемогти. Віват.

Почепцов, Г. Г. (2015). Сучасні інформаційні війни. Видавничий дім «Києво-Могилянська академія».

Published

2026-05-26

Data Availability Statement

Усі дані представлено у статті.

How to Cite

Havrylets, Y., & Anokhina, D. (2026). Asymmetric tools of influence and strategic communication in cyberspace during the Russian-Ukrainian full-scale war. Scientific Notes of the Institute of Journalism, 88(1), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.17721/2522-1272.2026.88.16

Most read articles by the same author(s)